Political Philosophy Part 1
Summary week 9: Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712 – 1778.
Links: Notes on Rousseau
‘… the human
understanding is greatly indebted to the passions which, it is universally
allowed, are also much indebted to the understanding. It is by the activity of
the passions that our reason is improved, for we desire knowledge only because
we wish to enjoy…’ (ed. GDH Cole: J-J Rousseau The Social Contract &
Discourses p 61).
1. Background:
1.1 Born in
Tutored by his father who read him romances etc: “I understood nothing – I felt everything”… perhaps a spoiled child? A complicated, contradictory, introspective, over-sensitive person. His political ideas are based on a view of human nature which perhaps reflects his own personality.
1.2 Age 16 traveled to
1.3 Louis XIV and absolutism – growing middle class demanding more freedom: Rousseau’s ideas influenced the demands of the French Revolutionaries in 1789: opposition to absolute monarchy and to social inequalities. Rousseau’s aims:
sovereignty of the
people based on the general will, direct democracy, social equality (see Quote
1)
2.
1749: Discourse on Language
1749/50: Discourse on Arts and Sciences
1753/4: Discourse on Inequality
1755: Discourse on Political Economy - article
for Encyclopaedia
1756: working on Political Institutions
(abandoned, and replaced by Contrat Social), Julie (novel) Emile (educational
treatise)
1762: Contrat Social: The Social Contract
3.
Key Ideas:
popular sovereignty
general will (which is never wrong)
society shapes people (for good and bad)
language, reason and morality originate with
society (did not exist before)
social contract (founds society)
false social contract (not based on general will)
creates a corrupt society
natural (pre-social) sentiments (sensibilité) (which are the basis of the
general will):
amour
de soi
pitié
4. Rousseau’s
early ideas:
4.1 Discourse on the Moral
Effects of the Arts and the Sciences (1749/50)
In 1749 he had an overwhelming revelation when he saw the
title of an essay for a competition, organised by the
In the essay written for the competition he expresses his controversial view: the problem with society is that it has warped our natural feelings: because of “taste, manners, politeness, decorum” etc, “We no longer dare seem what we really are, but lie under a perpetual restraint… What a train of vices must attend this uncertainty! Sincere friendship, real esteem, and perfect confidence are banished from among men. Jealousy, suspicion, fear, coldness, reserve, hate and fraud lie constantly concealed under that uniform and deceitful veil of politeness; that boasted candour and urbanity, for which we are indebted to the enlightened spirit of this age.” (ed. Cole, op cit, p 7).
4.2 Discourse on the
Origin of Inequality 1753/4
Here Rousseau argues that: “men in a state of nature, having no moral relations or determinate obligations one with another, could not be either good or bad, vicious or virtuous… Above all, let us not conclude, with Hobbes, that because man has no idea of goodness, he must naturally be wicked.” (op cit p 71)
4.3 The origins of
society: see Quotes 2, 3, & 4.
5. Rousseau’s
views on politics – see Quotes 5 – 12.